Sunday, May 30, 2010
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Criticism on Technology Stocks
Friday, May 28, 2010
Practicality
In the 1970s, Tom Bailey said: "If you can't wear it and you can't eat it, don't buy it (the stock)".
I find wisdom in his sentence. There are too many dubious stocks that are not worth our investment. For Bailey's statement to stay relevant in 2010, I'm revising it to: "If you can't wear it, eat it or use it... don't buy its stock."
I find wisdom in his sentence. There are too many dubious stocks that are not worth our investment. For Bailey's statement to stay relevant in 2010, I'm revising it to: "If you can't wear it, eat it or use it... don't buy its stock."
Monday, May 24, 2010
Value Investing
"When you buy a stock, you're not buying a piece of paper; you're buying part of a business. There's often a huge spread between the intrinsic value of the business and the price that a frequently manic stock market is putting on the paper. Buy a stock significantly above intrinsic value and you court a loss. Buy below intrinsic value and you have a good chance of making money over the long haul, with little risk of taking a permanent hit on your capital." -- Benjamin Graham
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Starhill Global has Annualized Dividend Yield of 11.9%
Last done at SG$0.535, Starhill Global REIT has an annualized (2006-2009) dividend yield of 11.9% (Rights in July '09 not factored). To put it in perspective, our local banks' annual interest rate can be as low as 0.125%.
Last week, YTL Pacific Star's REIT Management; Property Management; and REIT Management Holdings have been renamed to contain the phrase Starhill Global. This demonstrates the alignment of various stakeholders.
Presently, Starhill Global REIT invests shopping malls in Singapore (Wisma Atria and Ngee Ann City), China, Japan and Australia. Pending acquisition is the Starhill Gallery and Lot 10 malls in Kuala Lumpur. It is the most diversified retail REIT in SGX - very apt of the word, Global.
Friday, May 21, 2010
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Monday, May 17, 2010
District 13: Ultimatum
Even though District 13: Ultimatum has poorly dubbed English language, it is still entertaining with a layer of social commentary on racism.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Dividend-Paying Stocks are Back in Fashion
A long history of consistent dividends to shareholders is tangible proof that the company has more good years ahead.
Paying consistent dividends to shareholders demonstrates a high degree of assurance and company stability because cash is real. Dividends derived from company's earnings are recorded as paid. Annual reports and company's financial health can be manipulated but not dividend payments!
Predictable dividend records motivate shareholders to look forward to the next payment, usually every three, six or twelve months. This simply translates to a stronger base of supporters. E.g. ceteris paribus, Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) share price rose steadily because dividends are paid consistently since 7th May 1987.
Most Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks (except Google Inc, Berkshire Hathaway Inc, etc) that hoard cash to conduct acquisitions and/or buy back stock and/or reward its Board of Directors, have historically performed poorer. Why? Impatient shareholders will sell their positions due to little or no stock appreciation. Unhappy shareholders will sell their positions due to unthoughtful management of company profits.
Paying consistent dividends to shareholders demonstrates a high degree of assurance and company stability because cash is real. Dividends derived from company's earnings are recorded as paid. Annual reports and company's financial health can be manipulated but not dividend payments!
Predictable dividend records motivate shareholders to look forward to the next payment, usually every three, six or twelve months. This simply translates to a stronger base of supporters. E.g. ceteris paribus, Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) share price rose steadily because dividends are paid consistently since 7th May 1987.
Most Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks (except Google Inc, Berkshire Hathaway Inc, etc) that hoard cash to conduct acquisitions and/or buy back stock and/or reward its Board of Directors, have historically performed poorer. Why? Impatient shareholders will sell their positions due to little or no stock appreciation. Unhappy shareholders will sell their positions due to unthoughtful management of company profits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)